Automatic segmentation is very good and not perfect. These are the cases where it commonly gets things wrong. None of them are specific to this tool: they are hard for every background remover, paid ones included.
Fine hair and fur
Individual strands are thinner than the mask can resolve, so flyaway hair is softened or dropped, and a halo of the old background can survive between strands. Hair against a plain, contrasting background works far better than hair against foliage or a crowd.
Glass, water and anything see-through
The model decides what is subject and what is not. Something genuinely transparent — a wine glass, a bottle, a veil, smoke, a car windscreen — is neither, so it usually comes back opaque, keeping whatever was behind it, or is cut away entirely.
Thin structures
Wires, cables, bicycle spokes, chair legs, railings, jewellery chains, spectacle arms and plant stems. Because the mask is computed at 1024 pixels across, a feature narrower than about four pixels in a 4000 pixel-wide photograph can simply vanish.
Low contrast
A white shirt against a white wall, a black dog on a dark sofa, grey machinery in a grey workshop. If you have to look twice to find the edge, so does the model, and it will place it in the wrong spot.
Motion blur and shallow depth of field
Where the boundary itself is a gradient over twenty pixels there is no correct answer, only a choice. The mask tends to cut inside the blur, which can make a moving hand or a defocused shoulder look clipped.
More than one subject
The model looks for the salient subject. In a group photo it usually keeps everyone, but a person half out of frame at the edge, or an object the photograph does not emphasise, may be removed along with the background.
Shadows and reflections
A shadow cast on the floor is part of the background and goes with it, which can leave the subject looking as though it is floating. Reflections in a mirror or a polished table are treated inconsistently.
Heavily compressed pictures
A photo that has been through a messaging app several times has blocky artefacts along every edge. The model sees those blocks as real detail and the cut-out gets a ragged outline. Use the original file if you still have it.
If a result is wrong, it will usually be wrong in one of these ways, and a different photo of the same thing often fixes it. Nothing is stored, so trying again costs nothing.